Montreal only allowing Airbnbs for 3 months in the summer

Paywall :frowning_face:
Same story from CBC:

Couldn’t read the Business Insider article, but I DID note a headline for another one about a Canadian tourist who cancelled a $7,000(!) Airbnb reservation in the United States because of Trump’s tariffs and his talk of annexing Canada to the United States:

I don’t understand. How does allowing hosts to rent their places only in three summer months create ā€˜affordable housing’?

Who is looking for housing that they can only rent for nine months?

However:

According to the city, more than half of roughly 4,000 units currently available on the short-term rental market are illegal. The changes could therefore free up 2,000 units to the long-term rental market.

If the city only allows STRs that are legal, wouldn’t it be better to simply close them down?

4 Likes

If the goal is to make $xxx a year in LTR, then STR-ing for 3 months should make that goal, or near. The other 9 months can be family /friends. Never understood the ā€˜STRS take away affordable’…

Students for one. I’m sure there are other examples.
But I think this will more or less make strs go away almost entirely in Montreal.

??? It seems dead simple to understand. If entire houses are used exclusively for strs, there are less houses that are available at affordable rent for locals who need housing.

An interesting assumption. What makes one assume that the house would be ā€˜affordable’ and be ā€˜rented’? Both assumptions would be the LAST things I would do if I had to change over.

2 Likes

Oh, come on, Rolf. Obviously one can charge more for an str than a long term rental. And if a bunch of houses are being used exclusively for strs where there is a shortage of housing for locals, if regs dictate that they have to switch to long term tenancies, there will suddenly be a lot of housing available for locals who live and work in the area. If those landlords try to charge outrageous rents that the average person can’t afford, their places will sit empty, and they won’t be making any money at all.

Just as strs that are overpriced compared to similar listings in an area are not going to get booked as much as those that are less expensive.

All this is Supply and Demand 101.

I totally understand people not wanting to do long term rentals- a lot of str hosts who used to be landlords switched to str because having long term tenants was a huge hassle, with tenants not paying rent on time, trashing places, and having to deal with landlord/tenant laws that are tenant-friendly and making it a big PITA to evict bad tenants. (Of course, some tenants are great and appreciated by their landlords)

I don’t think there are many people who can afford to leave a house they own just sitting vacant, though, nor have enough ā€œfriends and familyā€ who would want to stay there enough to cover fixed costs. Especially in a place like Montreal, where you couldn’t just turn the heat off in the winter- the water pipes would freeze and burst.
Also, vacant homes are prone to be vandalized or have squatters move in.

I would expect a lot of str hosts who are severely affected by this kind of legislation to put the place up for sale.

This kind of regulation that Montreal has brought in makes little sense, aside from it likely leading to these strs ceasing to do str business at all, even in the summer. Which would lead to more year-round housing for locals, which I do support in areas where affordable housing is scarce.

It seems to me like they just were overwhelmed, or didn’t want to deal with trying to crack down on license-less rentals, so decided to just make all strs illegal outside of 3 months a year.

But they also haven’t seemed to make any distinction between entire house strs and private room/guest house situations, where the hosts would never switch to a landlord/tenant scenario, no matter what. Barring these hosts from doing strs year-round makes no sense, as it has zero bearing on freeing up affordable housing for locals.

You might be surprised. Before Vrbo/AirBnB got really popular, people buying a second home didn’t count on renting it out to afford it.

When we bought our second home, I made sure we could afford it even if we didn’t rent it out.

Our country’s current administration has threatened to prohibit foreigners from renting out their homes. They think that will cause the foreigners to sell the houses cheap to locals and then the locals will make the money renting it.

In reality, most of the owners will come visit a few times a year but fire the staff that works for them taking care of guests. That’s what we would do. It’s typical - the government thinks differently than the people that the laws impact.

2 Likes

Similar situation close to me at Byron Bay.
Unhosted STR is now limited to 60 nights a year.
This was pushed for by the local town council. No where for local workers / family to live…the fall out is very interesting to watch

That’s a completely different situation, though. Like you said, you and others bought second vacation homes because you could afford to do so, without any thought of renting it out, even if you did end up using it for str down the road. Just like a guest room was part of my new house construction, with no thought of renting it out- it was originally intended for family and friends.

That isn’t anything like people who purchased homes with the sole intent of using them for strs.

So what is happening?

Tell us more…

202020202020

There used to be over 3000 listings in the Byron Bay Area, today - only 15 pages and all of these high end and looking like they have made development applications to council.
The number of ex Airbnb items on marketplace is mind boggling

I’m just wondering if others have had the same experience as me…

Hosting STR and LTR has worked out to be about the same financially for me, after savings on cleaning, arrival treats, laundry etc.

I’ve only done LTR on my Canadian house for 5 years, when I was establishing myself in Mexico before I sold the Canadian house, so it’s hard to compare financially to my str private room homeshare in Mexico.

But I would think that what you have experienced is more or less true, especially if you get the kind of long term tenants who are capable of maintaining things and don’t bother landlords with small repairs, looking after that sort of thing themselves. (i.e. toilet needs a new flapper, bedroom needs a fresh coat of paint).

Also it’s not just hard expenses to take into consideration- there is also one’s time to account for. Fielding requests and inquiries, messaging with guests, keeping the calendar and listing up-to-date, dealing with guests while in residence, if you add up your time and assign a reasonable per hour charge, that also adds to str expenses.
Whereas a hassle-free long term tenant requires virtually no time at all, aside from renegotiating the lease if they want to stay on.

1 Like

So true. It bothers me that these cities that believe that hosts are mostly illegal and that they are only money-grabbers and that by preventing STR it will create this ā€˜low cost housing for locals’.

It’s almost as though it’s a knee-jerk reaction to a housing problem when it’s only a minor factor. (Here, anyway).

ā€œLet’s get rid of all these short term rental landlords who are making a ton of money for doing nothing, then locals can rent these placesā€ seems to be the attitude and a very simplistic view.

Illegal hosts are probably in it for the money believing it to be easy money. (Which we all know it isn’t). So, as I said before, the city should concentrate not on legal hosts who are simply doing this as a job and concentrate their energies towards getting rid of the illegal hosts.

This is good for genuine hosts, good for the cities as it reduces SRT, good for the local economy and good for the guests as genuine hosts usually provide a better experience than those who are flying under the radar and ā€˜trying Airbnb’.

2 Likes

the Canadian gov’t vowed to get rid of str and did so in BC- and is placing huge demands on other provinces- 2 inspections each year, tons of rules, license fees- making it not worth it. They like to blame STR on their lack of housing, red tape on building new housing, mass immigration taxing the housing market, foreign investors using housing as money laundering activities and huge corporations buying up swaths of housing. STR people have become the scapegoat for the gov’t’s lack of planning.

1 Like

I’m in BC… are your inspections municipal? I don’t think that’s in either the federal or the provincial requirements.

The license application was a pain, but mostly it’s paperwork to prove it’s your principal residence and you are licensed with your municipality (if it’s required where you live).

1 Like