Actually, I disagree. Yes, there are dirtbags hosts who don’t give a darn about the guests and deserve to be whipped into shape through a policy like this.
But on the other hand, there are also dirt bag guests who will take advantage, break rules, scam hosts, and do their darndest to get something for nothing.
There are a number of scenarios where excellent hosts could end up unfairly penalized by this policy through no fault of their own. For example, think about this scenario.
A storm comes through the day before a guest with a month long reservation arrives and a tree falls on the roof of the house doing considerable damage and rendering the house uninhabitable. Obviously, the host is going to have to cancel the reservation. Equally obviously, in a case like that, any host worth their salt is going to completely refund the guest for their stay.
However, under the new policy, the host not only is going to have to refund the guest’s money, they are going to have to pay the cost of the accommodations the guest or AirBnB finds to replace the booking. So the hosts is going to lose out twice over— they’re going to lose the money they would’ve gotten for the guest stay, AND they’re going to be on the hook for paying for the guest’s accommodation for an entire month someplace else. AirBnB hasn’t set any limit of the cost the the alternate accommodations—and they will be last minute potentially so the cost could be considerably higher than even what the host was earning for the stay if they had been able to accommodate the guest.
Perhaps some of you are in better financial shape to weather something like this. However, a host like me, with one Airbnb, would be extremely adversely impacted by an event like this. Hosts who have multiple Airbnb units, where they could put the guest in another unit they own, are not going to be so severely impacted.
There are multiple scenarios where a house could be rendered uninhabitable through no fault of the host. I have no problem with the host being required to refund the money when they cannot allow the guests to stay for a legitimate reason. But I do have considerable heartburn with the host being required to pay for rehousing the guest after they’ve already refunded the guest’s money.
I see considerable scope for scammers to take total advantage of a host. IF there were no such thing as travel insurance, then it would be different. But every traveler has the option to buy travel insurance to cover unforeseen circumstances. Hosts should not be bankrupted for something that happened that was out of their control. And, unfortunately, if there is insurance that will pay for the host to re-house the guest, I am unaware of it.