I imagine the court hearing going something like this, if she has agreed to 29x4 nights but tries to evict the “guest” earlier, for whatever reason(s):
Judge: So you rented for 29 nights for four consecutive stays? Is that correct? And, in between those stays, you had the guest step out for five minutes, which you aver constitutes her releasing the premises back to you to start another “stay”. Did she remove all of her belongings during those five minute?
Sunny: Well, no, your Honor, but she agreed to my arrangement.
Judge to guest: Why did you agree to this arrangement?
Guest: Because she agreed to let me rent her place for 116 days and I thought she would honor our agreement. But now she is kicking me to the street. She said it is because I broke the rules. If she’s allowed to evict me, I have nowhere to go! (tears)
Judge to Sunny: What rules did she break?
Sunny: She had a party. And she brought food in the bedroom.
Judge: Was it a loud party? Did the neighbors complain? Were the police called?
Sunny: No, the police were not called.
Guest: I had four friends over, so there were five of us. We had dinner on the patio. My friends all left by 10:30. I have never eaten food in the bedroom.
Judge: 116 consecutive days means you have a legal Lessor/Tenant agreement; therefore, the tenant is allowed under law to have quiet enjoyment of the leased premises. She did not break any rules or laws and, therefore, I do not find grounds for eviction.
Judge to Sunny: By the way, unless you have a license for a long-term rental, I fine you $1,000. You will pay all attorneys’ fees. And, if you withhold her deposit without sufficient proof and documentation for damages, you will be fined treble damages.
And what Sunny is left with is a very angry tenant who is going to read the rules on normal wear-and-tear and take it to the nth degree. All Sunny has is a $250 deposit to cover damages.
All hypothetical, of course.